![astrophotography image stacking software mov astrophotography image stacking software mov](https://cdn.nightskypix.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/image-cleaned-after-6-photos-stacked.jpg)
- #Astrophotography image stacking software mov movie
- #Astrophotography image stacking software mov manual
- #Astrophotography image stacking software mov iso
When I compared my results using this method to the results stacking my JPEGs I felt I saw a significant improvement in the quality of the final image. Sometimes Registax 6 can be temperamental in which case I drop back to v5, but my experimentation suggested to me that if v6 did stack the images then it produced a better result than v5 so I always try v6 first. Align the images and then scan through them again throwing out whatever I or Registax decide isn't sufficiently good to include Load the TIFF images into Registax v6, leaving out any clearly poor imagesĤ. Process the RAW files with PIPP to crop, centre and re-order by quality, saving as TIFFģ. Capture around 100 to 120 images using APT (I keep both JPEG and RAW images).Ģ. Reordering means that it's easy to have an initial scan through the images when they're loaded into Registax and throw out any that are visibly too poor to want to include because they'll be the last ones in the list of files.ġ. PIPP has some other useful features though, such as ordering the frames by quality and cropping them down to centre the image making alignment much easier for Registax. I spent some time trying to convert the RAW files to TIFF, but PIPP eventually caught up with what I wanted to do just as I discovered that the EOS utilities will do the conversion. I began stacking JPEG images as Roger does, but it always irritated me that I know the RAW files have better quality data yet I wasn't able to stack use them because none of the stacking programs seem very happy processing them. I imagine you'll probably find you do something similar. I started off using Roger's solar imaging tutorial and slowly evolved my own way of working from there for both solar and lunar images. (APT shows the reported sensor temperature after each image where the camera supports it.) I actually leave a gap of a few seconds between images anyhow because it seemed to help with the stability of the sensor temperature. I use APT (AstroPhotography Tool) instead, but I imagine the end result is largely the same. Unlike Roger I don't use the EOS Utilities for controlling the camera. Should I be going about this differently? James, do you use Canon's eos utilities software on the laptop? I'm using it but I don't think it's possible to set the software to take images less than once every 5 seconds. Even with an Alt-az mount the stacking software will cope with the slight change in orientation of the image during the time of the exposure. You may have to take a few overlapping images and then make a mosaic to get a single image of a larger area. avi's of the Moon or planets? It will probably be easier to take around 1000 frames with this camera and stack them - the disadvantage being the small area covered with the webcam chip.
![astrophotography image stacking software mov astrophotography image stacking software mov](http://www.lonelyspeck.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/stack-example.jpg)
avi format that the stacking software will actually be able to read!Īs you already have a webcam have you tried this for taking. It can be quite tricky to get this into an.
#Astrophotography image stacking software mov movie
You can use the camera in movie mode but the problem is that the camera uses the. it describes Solar imaging but the processing (stacking ) technique is exactly the same for lunar photographs. Set the camera in JPEG mode (as the stacking software doesn't like RAW - but you can convert to TIFF if you have enough memory on your computer to enable them to be stacked.) and take at least 60-100 pictures. With your DSLR you may find it easier to take straightforward "still" photo's and stack them. I've taken single shots of the Moon using my DSLR which I am happy with but I've seen better images on this forum of people using the stacking method and I'm keen to give this a go. Up until now the only stacking I've done is of Jupiter with a webcam. Just to confirm I will be using an alt/az mount with goto which I will set to keep the moon in fov.Īny help on this would be much appreciated. I've only attempted to use registax 5 with avi's so far with my webcam but I understand it's possible to process Canon Raw files with PIPP?
#Astrophotography image stacking software mov manual
I'm wondering if the correct way is to set the above exposure in manual mode and perhaps use an intervalometer to automatically take shots say 1 per second for a period of 2 minutes or more. Should I then be proceeding to convert these files to avi's in order to stack them in registax?
#Astrophotography image stacking software mov iso
In movie mode I set the iso and exposure as above and also the movie rec. I've been experimenting with my camera indoors today (as it's still raining) using both of these settings.
![astrophotography image stacking software mov astrophotography image stacking software mov](http://www.autostakkert.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/20140517_2204UTC_Mars_RGB_rel.jpg)
My question is should I be setting these values with my camera in movie mode or manual mode? Hoping to get some advise to enable me to stack some images together of the moon using my Canon 600d at prime focus with my 4" MAK.įrom what I've read on here so far the recommendation is to take around 120 frames at say 400 iso and exposure at or around 1/1000.